We left off at a heady moment in comics-to-film history, with Superman: The Movie and Superman II bringing summer blockbuster returns to the Salkind's and a coup to DC Comics' image as a multi-media publisher. Comics may have started out as 'funny books', but by 1978, funny books had turned into seriously big business.
By contrast, Marvel Comics made a few TV movies in hopes of catching a Hulk-assisted Thor or Daredevil foothold for the small screen and generally tried to avoid bankruptcy. DC took a few years to finish mining (perhaps gutting is a better word) the Superman film franchise with a 3rd and 4th shockingly bad installment, plus a failed try at bringing Kal-El's cousin Supergirl into her own film dynasty. Then they let the other World's Finest shoe drop and unleashed the next forward stride in theater-bound superheroes. Tim Burton's 1989 Batman introduced the Dark Knight version of the character (i.e., not the Adam West campy variety) to film-goers, a version that comics had been aspiring to ever since the 1966 TVing of the character left a bitter taste in purist's collective mouths. West's cowl will always be fondly remembered, but this film established itself with Burton's quirky goth stylings, very large budget, very experienced and talented cast, and the crowning touch of Jack Nicholson playing The Joker. The hardest sell for most fans was Michael Keaton (comedic actor, Beetlejuice for pity's sake!) playing that darker and more grim Batman. But it worked, and audiences identified with the fight for justice waged by a traumatized orphan without benefit of superpowers. If not for this film, Batman Begins would never have had a chance to continue the maturing of the on-screen persona into the even more modern and sophisticated tale of a one-mortal-man war against crime.
Success again breeds flattering imitators, and more comic book movies tried to make The Great Transition. Again, more misses than successes but practice makes better and film makers were starting to get a sharper screen image of what and what not to do. For a time, it seemed the accepted industry view was to look back for more film-worthy material rather than forward...at least a spate of movies went for comics characters from an earlier time. Disney tried their superhero hand again with a pulpish love letter to Old Hollywood based on Dave Steven's nostalgic comic The Rocketeer, and it made a small profit. The first superhero, The Phantom, did better in box office thanks to added ticket sales in Australia, where the character is considered nearly a deity and an adopted national treasure. The Shadow, third missile in the pulp- to-comics-to-movies salvo, also made a profit. None warranted a sequel, but each at least ended up in the black. Spawn, based on Todd McFarlane's Image Comics character, landed in about the same so-so boat while 1989's The Punisher was reviled by....well, everyone. Dolph Lundgren ain't no Frank Castle, skull emblem belt or no.
A different first was around the corner, though, and if people thought Tim Burton could serious-up a comic book hero, they hadn't seen anything yet. Up until now, big screen superheroes had been lifted from the pages of one of the Big Two Comics Companies...DC, since Marvel's day in the Hollywood sun had not yet arrived. DC, now part of the Time-Warner family, was like any large corporation: You exploited the product (a superhero) without taking too many risks or too many chances in a film treatment. Appeal to as many folks as possible, accentuating the profits. A few characters that started off being published by an independent company other than The Big Two were snatched up in lucrative deals when it appeared they could be opted for a film, and thus were also shielded by that same Big Company Mindset. But in 1994, the first independent comic book property to become a film franchise premiered: Caliber Comics The Crow. Driven by a heavy metal soundtrack and with Detroit as the urban war zone backdrop, this film mirrored its black-and-white, no frills independent roots perfectly. This wasn't about a hero out for justice. This was about a supernatural revenant rising from the grave to exact bloody, bullet-raining vengeance for the murder and rape of his girlfriend by the same punks who took his life, pure and simple. The dark hallmarks of Burton were traded in for a Gothic raw vision that spared no one, but most especially not the wicked. The tragic death of star Brandon Lee in the making of the picture did nothing to detract from the bleak, haunted spell it cast. Later independent comics film projects, from The Mask to Cowboys and Aliens to Red to 300 were built on foundations set down by The Crow.
The Crow was also parent to another very influential superhero movie from an independent comic producer, in this case Dark Horse Comics. DH had been publishing an irreverent send-up of traditional comics with Blazing Carrot. In the pages of that character's book there had appeared a group called Mystery Men...marginally powered costumed adventurers who banded together to fight crime and generally get a laugh or two out of the reader. From Mr. Furious, whose power stems from his 'boundless rage', to The Shoveler, a man with a scoop shovel and a mission to use it for good, to The Spleen, a one-man chemical warfare dispenser, to The Bowler and her mystic ball, to The Sphynx whose main power is being 'terribly mysterious', to the Blue Rajah who is a master of fork-flinging, these guys would be the B-Team of any given megalopolis's superhero faction. Maybe even C-Team. But they tickled comedian Ben Stiller, and he took on a script treatment to bring an abridged and tweaked version of the group to the silver screen. 1999's Mysery Men relied on witty dialogue, outrageously bizarre characters, and an ensemble cast to breathe life into these unlikely heroes. Only a film treatment of The Inferior Five could have taken the comics form to gently chiding task as well, and those rights from parent DC no doubt would have cost way too much to secure. So it was a small film, based on a small independent comic company series, but it was generally lauded as a quirky, fun comic book fable that made a tidy modest profit. So how is it groundbreaking?
Because major studios were watching with keen interest. This included 20th Century Fox, who had bought the screen rights to Marvel's The X-Men in 1994 and had gone through turnaround hell with scripts and ideas for a movie ever since. Given the powers of the mutant heroes involved and the sheer number of team members, the budget would be considerable. And 20th was just none too certain what the prospects would be for box office on a superhero team film. This would be the first of its kind in that respect, and the first large, serious attempt to bring a Marvel Comic property to the screen. There was just nothing that had gone before to give them an indicator of how much they should commit to such a project, or if they should let the option expire altogether. But then came Mystery Men, a team superhero film albeit not a very serious one in tone or scope. But it made a profit. And with that assurance, the green light flared bright.
In 2000, X-Men premiered. And it made a profit, a big profit. And turned Hugh Jackman into a star. And Halle Berry into a bigger star. And Patrick Stewart into a bankable movie actor. And brought what had been elusive fame and accolades to Ian McKellan. It also proved that Marvel properties could vie for box office bucks as well as any DC property, finally bringing mainstream movie treatments to a succession of characters afterward: The Hulk, The Incredible Hulk, Daredevil, Punisher, Punisher: War Journal, Fantastic Four, & Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. None were as successful as the X-Men film trilogy, but neither were they failures. Combined with Columbia's big business Spider-Man film in 2002, Hollywood at large began to take note. While DC had enjoyed the backing of parent company Warners for several years, Marvel was still relegated to whatever studio shot them the highest offer for properties. That changed in 2010 when Disney bought Marvel. Disney's Pixar division had (finally!) had their own masked hero success with a wonderful big screen animated superhero epic, 2004's The Incredibles, and they were ready to get into the live-action superhero biz.
Which in turn led to successful big screen, updated treatments by the House of Mouse for Marvel's Iron Man. And then Captain America. And then Thor. And even though The Hulk's two previous big screen movies had been pretty tepid, each success brought Disney a step closer to trying something totally unprecedented: Taking the main characters from 4 franchise movies and putting them together in a team film. Backed now by people who knew a thing or two about promotion and film production, the Disney-backed Marvel flicks began to have brilliant drop-in scenes during or after the credits, with Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury showing up to recruit various heroes for something called 'The Avengers Initiative'. Fanboys swooned. Buzz became fever-pitched and ear-shattering. And 2012's The Avengers, helmed by Joss Whedon, did not disappoint. It was the. Single. Biggest. Film. Of that year. Period. As with the individual movies leading to it, each comic book character was given a bit of an update to better fit in the modern world, but in storylines lifted from the early, great comic book exploits of those heroes. Thus the films escaped some of the darker tones running rampant in some books and superhero movies, while retaining a realism and humor that worked to keep said heroes heroic. Still, Earth's Mightiest Heroes might never have 'Assembled!' even once onscreen without the debt owed to little, quirky and endearing Mystery Men.
SPECIAL HONORABLE MENTION: COMICS MOVIE MOST LIKELY TO MAKE KIDS READ A BOOK...A REAL BOOK!
In 2003, 20th Century Fox went to the comic book well and chose an Alan Moore (writer of the Watchmen, V for Vendetta and From Hell graphic adventures) property that had been published by America's Best Comics, and thus was born the movie take on The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. The comic and movie premise is simple: It's the end of the 19th Century, and in this parallel world, all the characters from what we know as written fiction are real historical figures. This includes Allan Quatermain, from 'King Solomons Mines', Dr. Henry Jekyll (and Mr. Hyde), Mina Harker from 'Dracula', Captain Nemo from '20,000 Leagues Under the Sea', Dorian Gray from 'The Picture of Dorian Gray', and Rodney Skinner, Gentleman Thief, who had 'liberated' a formula from a deceased scientist to turn himself into an Invisible Man like the story of the same name. The story follows a pending world crisis brought about by a mysterious villain bent on starting a World-Wide War such as the Earth has never seen (WWI and WWII still being decades off), and a shadowy British government project to bring together several extraordinary individuals to function as a team and thwart the madman. Think of it as a 19th Century Justice League. Critics slammed it. It hemorrhaged money with poor ticket sales. Fans who loved the ripping and humorous original comic book reviled it for being too loosely based on the original material, and for the studio decision to add in US Secret Service agent Thomas Sawyer (grown into a young man since his Mark Twain story days) to cement a better reception in America. I've read the series. Love it. I've watched the film, many times. Love it. The film is guilty on all fandom sin counts. BUT...despite all that, the fun of the comic translated to fun on the screen. It works as a movie even with the changes necessary to make it cinematic. It even found an appreciative audience as a cult film with Steampunk fans. And, the best thing of all, it challenged its audience in a way few films dared. I have a rep as a comics fan. And as a reader. So as the movie debuted, and long after, I get questions about this film and they generally go like this: 'Saw LoEG yesterday....I liked it! (sound of surprise in the voice) But I didn't know who all the characters were. Who the heck is _____________??? (usually referring to either Quatermain, Dorian Gray, or Mina Harker)' When the question is answered and the particular literary source named, the follow up is, 'I'm going to have to read that book...'cause I -liked- that movie!' Any film that turns viewers into potential readers of classic literature is doing something very right in my estimation.
And so the current landscape of superhero movies has battle lines drawn at the box office. DC's Batman Begins, Dark Knight, and Dark Knight Rises were critical and box office successes overall and brought to a receptive public a vision of serious, adult, dramatic costumed heroics that matured childhood icons into living, breathing people while dimming some of the altruism, heroics and humor of earlier treatments. Man of Steel seems to have very, very successfully done for Superman what those other three films did for Batman, and in the same darker, grittier vein. Forays into DC's other properties like Catwoman and Green Lantern were dramatically less well received and bled money. Marvel's The Amazing Spider-Man re-launched the movie webhead franchise in a more emo fashion to keep with the times, and barely before the dust had settled on the first triple-movie franchise. While Ghost Rider, the nigh-unwatchable Ghost Rider 2, and an X-Men Origins: Wolverine film did less business, X-Men: First Class delivered a dandy second-tier movie owing more to the original version of the team than the previous films. And in the Big Box Office ranks for Marvel properties, their updated versions of Avengers and the individual team members, continues with a more traditional, kid-friendly comics blend of drama, humor, friendship & team work for the greater good to bring in audiences by the droves. Two ongoing, vastly different celluloid superhero visions, done LARGE, with movie-goers in different camps about which they prefer...but both visions making consistent Hollywood homers.
Except for the last entry here...a unique amalgam of BOTH those visions which surprised even the seasoned tinsel town set by raking in quadruple what the film cost to make. Kick-Ass hit screens in 2010. Technically a Marvel property, it's part of their Icon imprint...which means the stories are not part of the larger Marvel character universe and canon. Not that many of the larger Marvel universe characters are actually part of that canon anymore in print, either, with each title kind of existing in its own pocket dimension. The story follows Dave Lizewski, an altruistic teen and comic book fan who sets out to become the world's first real superhero. In a very, very real world. In the printed version, writer Mark Millar pulled no punches in that respect. Dave had set out on an admirable quest, but he was only a kid and life, and The World, had some harsh lessons in store for him. The film has heaps of violence and bad language, just like you'd find in everyday life, especially if you lived around the seedier elements of society and decided to battle criminals while wearing a mask. Dave quickly finds himself nearly killed while trying to dispense justice, his non-lethal intentions and tactics no match for street brutality. Then he meets two other people who are also living masked, secretive lives with a backstory straight from a comic book. Police officer Damon Macready refused to cave to the bribes and corruption his position on a big city force required, so his wife was killed and he was framed for drug crimes and sent to prison. His infant daughter was looked after by a fellow cop, and turned back over to Damon on his release. Macready began a plan of vengeance, plotting to kill the men who had taken his wife and career, and training his daughter from the time she could walk to be his helper. As Big Daddy and Hit Girl, they use heavy ordinance, lethal force, investigation and military/police tactics to kill drug runners, steal their cash, and use it to fund their crusade. And they were getting closer to the crime bosses with each mission. Hearing about another masked vigilante on the streets, they set up a meeting with Kick-Ass, Dave's costumed identity, to see if he would be a worthy addition to their duo. His tasers and batons and heroic notions leave them pretty cold. But their fates are now twined, and against all odds they do become allies in the ongoing war for justice. Comic book backstories, noble ideas of making the streets safe, wilting amounts of gun and blade violence, filthy language...all surrounding a film and a theme with a lot of heart.
Not since Stan Lee imagined half a century ago how a real kid with powers could face the challenge of being a masked mystery man in the real world of New York City has there been this kind of fresh take on the mythos. While not emo, there's plenty of teen angst to go around, and the charm of the fourth wall being broken is also part of the formula: These characters know they are at least acting like heroes in a comic book, and taking those steps into the real world. If I was 15 again, I would so identify with the yearnings, reasonings and emotions Dave goes through on his journey from comics nerd to silly vigilante wannabe to semi-capable street fighter bent on making a difference in an indifferent world. Add to the mix an endless ability to turn the standard comic trope upside down, and another facet of the film and comic's charm shines. The kid sidekick is usually a source of kid-in-distress plot devices, but in this case is the most bloodthirsty and dangerously violent of the heroes. The strongest and most competent of the vigilantes are waging a war on crime, but they have no lofty fantasies about doing it honorably; they have no code against killing. A lot of people. Often. The teen hero who pines for his High School crush in his nerdish civilian ID is pretty common, but here when the girl discovers his costumed identity, she ravishes the kid. A lot. Often. And is ravished by him in return. Who says teen hormones only rage in the male gender?
So what's the future going to hold? Movie options for the Fantastic Four and Daredevil have reverted back to Marvel, nee Disney. The first post-Avengers flick, Iron Man 3, proved a financial success and, more, proved that Marvel/Dis has more stories to tell and the deep pockets and talent pools of creative folks to take it the the screen well. From far left afield and stage right, they plan their next major panels-to-previews project, Guardians of the Galaxy to be released in 2014. And per contract, Joss Whedon is set to launch the first non-animated Marvel-based TV series in many a year, Agents of SHIELD, in late 2013. Still playing catch-up in successful movie productions, DC/Warner has been no stranger to letting TV host their live-action properties and their ratings have been solid. Smallville held a decade-long run that surprised me, and it served as a perfect platform to introduce non-comic geek audiences to characters never before brought into the mainstream including Zatanna, Green Arrow, Martian Manhunter, Cyborg, Black Canary, Booster Gold, Blue Beetle, and, God love 'em, The Legion of Superheroes and the Justice Society of America. And while a Wonder Woman pilot was not picked up for a series, Arrow got a green light for weekly status and went on to be named the Best New Television Drama in its freshman year. Rumors fly wildly on the thermals from Man of Steel receipts that DC would love to do a Justice League film project.
Despite serious reservations about the course both of the Big Two have taken in the last year regarding the image of their characters, i.e., 'Let Watchmen be dark and gritty and let mainstream icons be a cut above that.', I find it's the greatest time yet to be a comics fan. And even considering the niggling about the Big Two, independent comics companies are currently publishing some of the best work to be found anywhere, and in greater volume than ever before. Only someone my age (read, Old Comics Guy) can appreciate the contrast between those lean, early years when a Sesame Street segment with Superman and Batman or a fair labor law PSA with some of the 1966 Batman show cast members caused excitement, and the rich comic book-embracing environment we live in today.
Still, like a fan missive in a letter col page of comics long ago, to express only the positive would seem unduly sycophantic. So the cynic in me demands a counter weight to end this entry, and after researching so many superhero and comics-birthed films, it's not a hard task.
There's nothing that makes one's geeky heart skip a beat than watching a film version of a beloved character that does right by the comic, the fans, and the rest of the audience. Conversely, Hell hath no fury like 1. A woman scorned, and 2. A fanboy or fangirl treated to their favorite character onscreen in a lousy, ill-conceived and poorly realized adaptation. And remember, every character in comics is somebody's favorite. When Hollywood forgets or disregards this rule, these happen. Plus, drama careers are ended, producers file for various Chapters, and executives join the ranks of the unemployed. As a cautionary public service, here are my personal picks for the Comic Book Movie Hall of Shame. If you must watch these to see just how wrong a comic book film treatment can go, wait until discount dollar day at your local video store. Then, go find it for free at your local library instead.
1. Catwoman - Apparently, someone at the studio thought it would be a good idea to pay DC no doubt ungodly amounts of cash to license their popular villainess character, and then make a movie about someone else, in some other costume, with some other backstory. Halle Berry looks good, the costume looks bad, and the film was worse. So many bad, obviously bad, and stupendously bad calls were used in the making of this picture, it should have been a Bizarro World Production, made in accordance with the Bizzaro Code.
2. Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance - Take anything that worked even marginally in the first film and get rid of it. Then take anyone who brought their acting chops to display onscreen with Nicholas Cage in the first movie, and don't invite them back. This not only hurts the film, but alienates folks like Peter Fonda, Sam Elliot, and their fans. Also, don't replace those interesting characters and their experienced actors with anyone of interest. Finally, take the redeeming 'Deal with the Devil' vibe done in a Southwestern US setting and move the whole thing to Europe. Mix, bake, release in theaters for 10 minutes and one week later slap it onto DVD before word or odor spreads.
3. Steel - For the same reason that Robin or Nightwing has never rated his own movie, the same reason you don't make a Hero for Hire film with Iron Fist as the hero and no mention of Luke Cage, and the same reason you would be hard-pressed to make a Mon-El movie without involving Superman somehow, you shouldn't make a Steel flick without some Superman vibe and reference in it. It robs one of the coolest, noblest African American superheroes in existence of the reason he became a superhero to start with. Plus, notice how Marvel cast an athlete instead of an actor to play War Machine? No? Next time, follow their example.
5. Vampirella - I had limited the movies mentioned here to theatrical release films involving superhero characters (thus no dwelling on films like Roger Corman's Fantastic Four since it was never released, and DC's Jonah Hex as he's not a superhero). But Vampirella was direct to video, so people -did- pay money to see it, and it's so perfectly wretched, I'm stretching the guidelines a little to include it. For a film like this to work, it generally has to follow the spirit and intent of the comic its based on or else fans will not be pleased, and you risk losing cohesion enough to alienate the rest of the viewers as well. Thus, when bringing to life a character so sensual and violent that she had to first appear in a black and white Warren publication to avoid getting rejected by the comics code of the 1970's, don't skimp on the skin and the action. And don't skimp on a budget since this is actually a sci-fi story at heart. The way this turned out, it must have been directed by Alan 'Skimp' Smithee. So combine a plank-like leading actress who refused to wear the traditional costume (and was incapable of filling it out), numbingly bad plotting, and effects that set the standard for excellence 30 years prior, and you get this drek. The slam-dunk low of this entry is simple: how hard could it have been to make a fun, titillating little film about a scantily-clad sci-fi/supernatural heroine that would have tickled the hearts of geeks around the world? Apparently too hard for the 'creative' folks here to pull off.
6. The Spirit - See 5. above, re: 'follow the spirit and intent of the comic' in bringing it to the screen. The Spirit is supposed to be a little funny, a little racy, and a little concerned with what realistically would happen to a regular joe who decided to go first-to-fist against 1940's crooks. This movie -could- have been a lighter, pulp fiction version of Kick-Ass. Instead, it became a Lost Sin City Episode with no fun, no raciness, and no realism at all including the filming technique, look and style. Will Eisner, revered creator of the character and legendary comics innovator, deserved better. And Frank Miller should have known better.
Film Critic prepping to pass judgment on The Spirit film.
7. Howard the Duck - Including this almost seems like smacking the skinny kid square in the glasses because it's been so reviled for so long. BUT it makes my list because it's not only badly written, badly acted and poorly presented effects-wise, it also breaks the Spirit of the Book rule of 5. and 6. I read Steve Geber's comic's writing as a kid, and though not all of it scored with me, a lot of the absurdist and humorous element did. Here was a guy who delighted in making villains like Bessie the Hellcow (the Bovine Bloodbeast, no less!) and Dr. Bong to fight his equally unlikely hero, Howard the Duck. Gerber, like the best humorists, wasn't afraid to take chances. Some worked, some didn't, but it was always gutsy. The movie was made in such a 'safe' and gutless fashion, it still angers me.
8. Captain America - Not the First Avenger one, the 1990 one. This flick suffers several ills that, like all the little mistakes in real life sagas that defy odds yet come to pass, add up to one great disaster. I'm not sure where Casting was the day of the auditions. Apparently, taking a long lunch break after which they spread out publicity photos on a table like the famous All-Star Squadron #1 cover and picked actors at random. Writers, producers and/or the studio decided, in the spirit of political correctness, to avoid the whole N-a-z-i issue despite this being a movie about a WWII war superhero and make the Red Skull Italian instead of Hitler's right hand man. And this dog gets one final smack because of all the heroes making it to the big screen, Cap deserved his due. His serial bore little resemblance to the comic character, not even his signature shield. The 1970's TV movies with Reb Brown were awful. Not cheesy-fun awful like MST3K, just plain offal. This movie could finally have done Cap a little justice. Instead, it took another 20+ years.
9. Superman III - Some would say that Superman IV: The Quest for Peace is more deserving of this spot, and it's a close call. But while both were silly, pointless shadows of the first two quality films, this one wasted some major talent on the road to doofiness. Namely, Richard Pryor, Chris Reeve, Annette O'Toole & Robert Vaughn. Costuming, if you can't at least get Clark's glasses straight, hang it up. And it may have been fun to have Superman put a bully in his place in the second film, but it's pretty mean-spirited to have Supes making sport of an alcoholic in this one. Worst of all, the creative folks knew this was bad, thus the ploy of using Pryor to prop it up in a stilted, silly comedy role that wasted his talents and still didn't achieve a box office win. Why not a villain from the Superman rogue's gallery instead of this inane plot? Still, plumbing the rogues to make a good continuation of a franchise doesn't always work either, as we see in....
10. Batman Forever - Again, most say Batman & Robin deserves this slot, but again, I disagree only because of the WTS (Wasted Talent Scale). George Clooney, Uma Thurman and Arnold Schwarzenegger v.s. Val Kilmer, Jim Carrey, Nicole Kidman, Drew Barrymore and Tommy Lee -freaking- Jones. Otherwise, it's a close call. The jarring loss of Tim Burton's style is even more jarring as this is the first film lacking it...but still trying to carry on business as usual in the hopes the audience won't notice. It doesn't work, nor does the direction as a whole if the performances are any indicator. This solid cast seems to have had a read-through, voted to all phone it in, and headed to the bank to deposit their checks.